Fish and whales keep greenhouse gases in the ocean


Ph.D candidate Angela Martin during fieldwork in Austevoll, Norway. Credit: Tonje K. Sørdalen.
Ph.D candidate Angela Martin during fieldwork in Austevoll, Norway. Credit: Tonje K. Sørdalen.
 

A new study from the University of Agder shows that animals are part of the natural carbon cycle process that absorbs greenhouse gas emissions.


Angela Helen Martin said, it is a good thing that carbon is trapped in the ocean, but less greenhouse gas emissions from humans is overall best for the climate.


She is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Natural Sciences at University of Agder (UiA).


Martin recently published a review article on how fishes and other animals affect greenhouse gases in the ocean. One of her conclusions is that there is a need to consider how animals affect carbon in order to design effective management of carbon in ocean habitats and of marine vertebrate populations.


Martin said, for example, if we only protect the plants that convert greenhouse gases to organic carbon, we can miss all the carbon storage delivered by the animals. And if we miss that, we may not get all of the carbon storage benefits from the habitat.


The review article was published in the journal One Earth. Martin´s co-authors were Heidi C. Pearson at the University of Alaska Southeast, Grace K. Saba at Rutgers University, and Esben M. Olsen at the Institute of Marine Research (Havforskningsinstituttet) and UiA.


Martin and her colleagues have studied how fish, whales, turtles, birds, and other marine animals affect the movement and storage of carbon in the ocean.


Martin said that the animals eat carbon in their food, which can then be stored in their bodies, excreted in their poop, or breathed out. Some fish and whales also poop nutrients that plants use to photosynthesize. These plants produce organic carbon from carbon dioxide. And when animals move, the carbon and nutrients can move with them. What we do know is that it is good for the climate if the carbon stays in the ocean, very good if the carbon sinks to ocean sediments, and bad if the carbon is released back to the atmosphere


Scientists so far do not know whether the overall effect of animals on carbon in different habitats is good, bad, or indifferent to the climate. Martin says it depends on the number of gas emissions released back to the atmosphere, balanced with the carbon stored.


According to Martin, the ocean has in the last decade absorbed a quarter of the Earth's greenhouse gas emissions through the carbon cycle. This cycle is a naturally occurring process.


Most emissions absorbed by the ocean do not go through the living components like plants, animals, bacteria, and so forth. Instead, they dissolve into the water and contribute to ocean warming and acidification. She underlines that greenhouse gas emissions need to be reduced to stop climate change from happening.


Although it represents a very small percentage of the carbon in the ocean, the biological pump, like plants, salt marshes, wetlands, mangroves, seagrasses, and animals can be affected through the management of the ocean resources. Nature-based solutions like that are a complementary tool to emissions reductions to reduce the severity of climate change.


The scientists recommend future researchers bring together existing data to create new knowledge. They also recommend they conduct research at a scale that can be incorporated into management decisions and policies.


This can help to find the best approaches to management and lists four examples that need science-based management

  • Should carbon-trapping by fishes be a consideration of fisheries management?

  • Would protected areas be a good way to manage carbon trapped by fishes?

  • Should protections be applied in a specific location or a series of locations?

  • Should any protections apply for the whole year, or are specific seasons more important?

The review article has over 160 sources, including more than 150 scientific articles; two reports; one book; and fisheries data published by the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations) and ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea).


Martin and their team found that carbon breathed out by marine mammals is released back to the atmosphere, yet carbon breathed out by fishes in the deep sea can stay in the ocean and out of the atmosphere for over a hundred years. There are many descriptions of animals influencing carbon or providing nutrients, in both climate-positive and negative ways. The biggest knowledge gaps, though, were estimates of how much carbon is influenced by marine vertebrates, and what happens to the carbon afterward. She considers the research to be highly relevant to society, especially since new policies are being introduced on this topic.


Some carbon-rich ocean habitats, such as salt marshes and seagrasses, are now being incorporated into policies to reduce the impacts of climate change, which will affect us all.

3 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All