Polymorphs are molecules that have different molecular packing arrangements despite identical chemical compositions. In a recent paper, researchers at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) combined their proprietary (GSK) and published (CCDC) datasets to better train machine learning (ML) models to predict stable polymorphs to use in new drug candidates.
CCDC curates and maintains the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). For the past century, scientists all over the world have contributed published, experimental crystal structures to the CSD, which now has over 1.1 million structures. The paper's authors used a drug subset from the CSD combined with structures from GSK. The GSK structures were collected at different stages of the pharmaceutical pipeline and are not limited to marketed products. Co-author Dr. Jason Cole, the senior research fellow on CCDC's research and development team, explained why structures gathered at different stages of the drug discovery pipeline are so important.
Cole said, in early-stage drug discovery, a crystal structure can help to rationalize conformational effects, for example, or characterize the chemistry of a new chemical entity where other techniques have led to ambiguity. Later in the process, when a new chemical entity is studied as a candidate molecule, crystal structures are critical as they inform form selection and can later aid in overcoming formulation and tableting issues.
This information can help researchers prioritize their efforts—saving time and potentially lives down the road.
Cole said, by understanding a range of crystal structures, scientists can also assess the risk of a given form being long-term unstable. A full characterization of the structural landscape leads to confidence in taking a form forward.
How do ML models in pharmaceutical science benefit from multiple datasets?
Industrial data sets reflect more than just science; they reflect cultural choices within a given organization. You will only find co-crystals if you look for co-crystal as an example. Most companies prefer to formulate a free, or unbound, drug. One can assume that the types of structures in an industrial set reflect conscious decisions to search for forms of given types, whereas fewer bounds are placed on the researchers who contribute to the CSD. ML models benefit from two key things: data volume and data specificity. That's why coupling the volume and variety of data in the CSD with proprietary data sets is so helpful.
Large amounts of data lead to more confident predictions. Data that are most directly relevant to the problem lead to more accurate predictions. In the predictions that use CCDC software, we select a subset of the most relevant entries that is large enough to give confidence. The GSK set is bound to have highly relevant compounds to other compounds in their commercial portfolio. So the model-building software can use these. Industrial researchers working with highly relevant data can run into issues when they don't have enough to generate confident models.
Consider that CSD software typically picks around two thousand structures from the 1.1 million in the CSD. The industrial set is tiny by comparison, but you could pick, say, 40 or 50 highly relevant structures. You'd have insufficient data to build a good model with that alone, but the added compounds from the CSD supplement the data set. In essence, by including the GSK and CSD sets we get the best of both worlds: all the highly relevant industrial structures and a set of quite relevant CSD structures together to build a high-quality model.
Why do polymorphs present a risk to the pharmaceutical industry?
The different packing arrangements mean that one polymorph might be more suited for therapeutic delivery, while another form of the same compound might not. Researchers use crystal structure databases to make knowledge-based predictions about whether a potential new drug is comprised of a good, stable form that manufacturers can make, store, and deliver in a therapeutic manner. The authors at GSK and CCDC completed a robust analysis of the small molecule crystal structures containing X-ray diffraction results from GSK and its heritage companies for the past 40 years. They then combined those results with a drug subset of structures from CCDC's CSD, which contains over 1.1 million small-molecule organic and metal-organic crystal structures from researchers all over the world.
Journal Information: Leen N. Kalash et al, First global analysis of the GSK database of small molecule crystal structures, CrystEngComm (2021). DOI: 10.1039/D1CE00665G